HMRC publishes GfC20 guidance on the VAT fund management exemption for outsourced services (10 September 2026)
This page records one dated change. For the rules in United Kingdom as they stand today, see the United Kingdom guide →
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Tax
- VAT
- Change type
- Update
- Status
- In force
- Impact
- Watch
- Announced
- 10 September 2026
- Effective
- 10 September 2026
- Authority
- HM Revenue & Customs
- Systems
- Tax engine, Invoicing
- Verified
- Fetched from official source · high confidence
UK fund managers and providers of outsourced services to qualifying funds.
Fund managers and outsourced service providers: review master services agreements against the single/multiple-supply indicators in GfC20.
Tax engineInvoicing
HMRC published Guidelines for Compliance GfC20, 'Help with VAT on fund management services', on 10 September 2026. It sets out HMRC's recommended approach to deciding whether outsourced fund management services are single or multiple supplies for the fund management exemption (Items 9 and 10 of Group 5, Schedule 9 VATA 1994): the fund must be a qualifying fund, and the services must, viewed broadly, form a distinct whole specific to and essential for managing that fund; merely physical or technical supplies do not qualify.
What changed in detail
HMRC published Guidelines for Compliance GfC20, “Help with VAT on fund management services”, on 10 September 2026.
It sets out HMRC’s recommended approach to deciding whether outsourced fund management services are single or multiple supplies for the fund management exemption (Items 9 and 10 of Group 5, Schedule 9 VATA 1994).
The fund must be a qualifying fund. The services must, viewed broadly, form a distinct whole specific to and essential for managing that fund. Merely physical or technical supplies do not qualify.
What it means
This is HMRC guidance on how it reads the existing exemption, not a change to the law. The practical test is whether the outsourced service, taken as a whole, is specific to and essential for managing a qualifying fund.
Providers whose services are largely physical or technical, such as data processing or office functions, should not assume the exemption applies. The guidance is a starting point for the analysis, not a certainty of outcome.
Proof
the services must, viewed broadly, form a distinct whole and be specific to, and essential for, the management of that qualifying fund
Source snapshot of the official page. Open full size ↗